Tuesday, July 13, 2004

The Bollywood Story

Lakshya, released two weeks before, has been declared a flop (failure) at the Indian Box Office. When I got to know this, it filled me up with a mixed feeling of rage, disgust and incomprehension. It was a genuinely good movie, a movie which stuck to a passionate storyline, had more than reasonable amounts of the typical Indian entertainment elements, and sought to innovate with a modern cinematographic approach, blended almost uniquely with youthful and passionate direction.

How much has Bollywood evolved? Or has it? For me, the progress has been digressive. From what I have personally observed, the basic fundamentals of moviemaking have given way to surface level masala formulas as the priority objects in the minds of the populist film-makers. There has been certain progress in the field of Technical Wizardry, most noticeably in the fields of Video Editing and Audio Mixing, but Technology will always be a tool, it's only as good as the beholder.

In Devdas, the two most prolific actresses of modern Bollywood, Aishwarya Rai and Madhuri Dixit danced in authentic Indian dresses, in perfect, much practiced synchronization to the digitally enhanced music performed by the most trained choir of Artisans; they danced at the largest sets ever built for an Indian movie, for the costliest Indian movie ever built. It was admittedly a visual spectacle.

But they never even came close to challenge the aura of the moment, when an indignant Prithviraj raised his head to see a thousand Madhubalas, dancing in contempt of the emperor, and in love of the prince. It was one of the very first colored songs in Indian movies; and he dance was hardly a practiced routine, rather an innate swinging. But it defined, for me, the best that Indian Cinema has ever produced.

I believe Indian cinema started out as a vibrant artform, where the protagonists were ready to experiment, but lay strongly on the fundamentals, but somewhere down the line, more in the recent years, it became a business. There's nothing wrong in that, just that this brings in the astute businessman perspective to the trade. Hence Actors are now children of movie entities, or models with fulsome bodies; the stories can be finished in a single page; and direction is done by part time producers, or their kin.

Where am I going with this, I don't know. But it's just disappointing to see that such a rich history of soul is followed by a pile of candyfloss.

3 Comments:

AJ said...

"...this brings in the astute businessman perspective to the trade..."Absolutely, but I would like to add something here though. Pinpointing who is at fault here is not as easy, that I think even you would agree with. I personally think that if its not driven by passion, it is not going to work your way. But lately movie makers and even our legends are compelled to work like "astute businessman". A movie costing a billion in Indian currency should leave them with sufficient profit, shouldn't it? And by saying that I do not mean that good movies won't fetch this money for the movie makers. All I
am trying to say is that passion and the level of entertainment still lacks in India. People still like those farting cheapstakes of "Hello Brother". That is why a movie like "kuchh kuchh hota hai" will always do better than any "Lakshya" here in our country.
But then, we also cannot look away from the fact that many directors have made a "huge-production-without-forethought-factories" out of our bollywood.

July 16, 2004 1:54 AM

 
Sameer said...

Hollywood is driven by bigger, meaner and more shrewd businessmen than we have here. What then, allows the movie makers there to experiment with different themes, investing huge amounts into their ideas?

That is why I believe that having business backing is not necessarily bad. The problem, I guess, lies with the Indian Movie Businessmen; who are stuck in the This formula works and that one doesn't trap.

Also, I think that community drives business, movies like Lakshya aren't made because the majority (and be very careful when you use that word in this country) doesn't like to watch a movie like Lakshya.

They'll better watch three "flourescent" figures passing the love ball around in the dreamy college campus, singing 11 songs in between.

Yeah, I know, majority sucks. :p

July 17, 2004 12:39 PM

 
Abhilash said...

It's true, with time, quality changes....take anything, its because people get high headed, take things for granted, and well, things become pretty much inane. Take for example American Music. The original rock and roll of the 50's was really good.....and now I tend to call Linkin' Park and Limp Bizkit nothing but damned nonsensical noise at over 150 feckin' decibels!

Indian cinema has definitely deteriorated with time. Can we even think of having another Pyaasa, Kagaz Ke Phool, Guide, Sholay, Abhimaan, Naya Daur, Mother India, Neel Kamal, Teesri Manzil, Woh Kaun Thi.......I can go on and on. It's the same with music. What started off as something to agument the mood and beautify the situation, has now turned into inane banality, that has no fore, no aft! Comapre "Aap Ki aankhon mein kuch mehke hue se raaz hain" with today's "Aaila re ladki mast mast tu aila re", "Lag ja gale se ke phir ye.." with "Aaja na chule meri chunari sanam". Even more irrational is the concept of songs like "Tujhe mirchi lagi to main kya karoon....teri naani mari to main kya karoon", "What is mobile number, what is your style number"...Shit man, where's the aesthetic sense gone?

Wooing then meant genuinely romantic numbers, that still moves us today. I positively go into cupid bliss when I hear the great Talat Mehmood's "Jalte Hain jiske liye" or Rafi chirping to "Kitna Pyaara Wada Hai", and literally feel the force of unfulfilled love when Mukesh croons "Jis Gali Mein Tera Ghar Na Ho Baalma", and the pain when Rafi sings "Chahoonga main tujhe, saanjh savere". Where do you get compositions like "Nainon Mein Bhadra Chaye", "Jinhein Hum bhoolna chahein" "Woh bhooli daastaan" and so many other Madan Mohan-Lata compositions? Alas, the golden Era is no more....songs then were integral to the story line. Nowadays they're just tools to attract audience. I still remember an article I read, Madan Mohan worked his artistes like slaves to get the perfection, the symphony and the synchrony required. Dada Burman would take up a movie only if the proposed songs were suited to the story line. Those were composers then, can we ever get the likes of Anil Biswas, Naushadji, Dada Burman, Pancham, Madan Mohan (God), anywhere? Or lyricists like Sahir Ludhianvi, Majrooh Sultanpuri, Kaifi Azmi, Shailendra, who transcended song lyrics to the pinnacles of poetry? Who can forget the immortal lyrics of "Jeena yahan, marna yahan", "Dil Aaj Shaayar Hai", "Wahaan Kaun hai Tera, musafir jaayega kahan", "Kahin deep jale kahin dil" "Aaj kal paon zameen par"?

When my dad proposed to mom back in the early 80's, he sang "Chaand Si mehbooba ho meri kab". Now I am 17, and if I sing that to my girlfriend, she's gonna kick me over to the moon. People, especially teens have gotten this thing into their head that to be radically modern, techno, is to be cool! Forgive them Lord, for they not know what they do!

Let's revive the Golden Era, let's bring our heroes home, home to our hearts, to our tradition...let it not come to the point that we genuine lovers of art and aesthetics are brought to the point of singing "Mere naina, sawan bhadon, phir bhi mera man pyaasa.......". Try and make as many youngsters appreciate the Golden Era...it is the root of our culture, of our tradition in this Century...let us keep the torch of Humanity burning!

February 14, 2005 10:55 PM

 

Post a Comment

<< Home