Who isn't a nationalist?
Mangal Pandey is an average movie. The makers had a choice between going for a realistic portrayal of the historic events; or blowing the facts apart for dramatic appeal. That is a choice every period movie maker faces. And the job in this case becomes difficult because of a certain lack of detailed documentation on the hero, his life and the actual events.
What I found to be interesting, though, was the strange path the makers of this movie chose in between the extremes of documentary accuracy and fantastical hyperbole. They gave up on accuracy for trivial exaggerations, but couldn’t find it in them to twist it enough to give a climax worth remembering. It reminds me of a contestant I once saw on American Idol qualifiers. The talented girl gathered enough guts to enact a dance sequence along with her vocals in the no-instruments round, but the trio of Simon-Paula-Randy were hardly convinced. It was because she did her little dance thingy at the wrong times, and with an irresolute intensity. The outcome was a mishmash that made me feel that she could have done better without playing the dance card.
Mangal Pandey is for me the same story. Not enough distortion to produce a climax of significance. And climaxes make or break movies. It’s the climax that gave Independence Day its extra millions, and the lack of it that made War of the Worlds revenues dip into mediocrity. You play the nationality card, and you build up the story for a climactic battle, and then you show the battle as a hasty scroll of imagery! That is illegal in the world of climactonomics.
Okay, enough of Mangal bashing. There are a few things to watch out for in the movie, however. Aamir, his moustache and his overbearing preening of the same while receiving his death sentence, are worth a watch. That, and the catchy title song make the movie worth a view. And then there’s Rani Mukherjee. She's looking tremendous again, and her growth as a seasoned actor is clearly visible. The romance between Amisha and the firang could have been built upon better. A note to Amisha – Take it easy with the expressions. Its really not about getting your eyebrows as high as possible.
We were fortunate (or unfortunate?) enough to get tickets to the night show of the movie on the 14th of August in current bookings. That in
Until then, a nation is the strongest sense of belonging for a human being. And if you come to think of it, the feeling of belonging is the strongest that man possesses. So you can hate your nation, critique its governance, prophesize its doom, leave it forever, and change your citizenship. But you cannot help your blood from racing every time you hear “Jan Gan Mann” being played.
You cannot help being a nationalist.
Labels: Movies












4 Comments:
i like the part about the sense of belonging :)
August 17, 2005 5:50 PM
Indeed.
Though, you have already mentioned it in your post, that someday "home" might mean our "Earth" to our forthcoming generations, there is something that I wanted to convey that somewhere, being a nationalist means being a fanatic and narrow-minded.
I am sure that this kind of feeling is in everyone. But if I put in some introspection to it, I will reach to the near base of this whole Planet-Country-City-House job. Let me clear up, I am a fanatic, fanatic about my parents, my family.
I am a nationalist if that counts being a nationalist but I am sure it is not in the rule book.
Please do me a favour and change the pronoun in the last line of your post. From "You" to "I".
August 17, 2005 6:17 PM
AJ: A nation is more than a territory. For an individual, it's that, and and the residents, their culture, the society, his or her milieu, and infact his or her parents. And nation, perhaps, is indeed a subset of the universal subdued set, "humanity".
When you want to support your parents and give them the best that you can, you show intent to provide for the citizens for the comunity that is your nation.
So if you want to rest all your credits at the bottom of the domicile tree, it hardly matters. You're still a nationalist in the rule book.
:)
August 19, 2005 12:09 PM
I appreciate the idea of proving it "on purpose", that everyone is a nationalist, up to an extent.
But please, keep me away from this nation crap. I don't want to be called even an "anti-nationalist". Don't relate me to this.
August 19, 2005 9:08 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home